

-
Center-backs: The main protectors in front of the goalkeeper, responsible for blocking shots, intercepting passes, and winning aerial duels.
-
Full-backs: Positioned wider, these players balance defense and attack, supporting wingers and covering the flanks defensively.
Defenders – Holding the Fort
Source: Premierleague
-
Central Midfielders (CMs): The playmakers who dictate ball movement and control possession.
-
Wide Midfielders (WMs): Operate along the wings, stretching the play and delivering crosses.
-
Attacking Midfielders (AMs): Creative players who unlock defenses with killer passes and goal-scoring opportunities.


This formation is one of the most popular due to its balance between defense and attack. It heavily relies on midfielders, who are expected to assist the defense while also pushing forward to support the attack. With its combination of solid defensive coverage and attacking potential, this strategy is one of the most commonly used in modern football.
-
Strengths: Great midfield control, attacking flexibility
- Provides a solid defensive foundation.
- Midfielders play a key role in both defense and attack, creating a dynamic and flexible formation.
- Offers width through the left and right midfielders, especially effective if they have the pace and stamina to support both attacking and defensive duties.
-
Weaknesses: Midfielders must work hard to support both attack and defense
- Places significant demands on the midfielders, whose versatility is crucial to the success of the formation.
- There’s a risk that only two players are left to defend if the midfielders lack discipline in tracking back.
- Potential lack of support for the striker, especially when the midfield is stretched.
-
Best for: Teams that like to keep possession and play an organized game
-
Strengths:
- Provides a strong defensive base to build from.
- Effective when facing stronger or faster teams.
-
Weaknesses:
-
Potential lack of support for the attackers.
-
Possible lack of width and forward passing options when transitioning from defense to attack.
-
-
Best for: Teams facing strong attacking opponents

The 2-1-3 formation is a variation that places a strong emphasis on both defensive stability and attacking capability. It consists of two central defenders, one defensive midfielder, and three players in the attacking midfield. This structure allows for a balance between solid defense and a potent offensive setup.
-
Strengths: Strong defensive shield with a dangerous attack
- Provides a solid defensive structure with two central defenders and one defensive midfielder.
- The three attacking midfielders can create width and provide support to both the defense and attack, making it a versatile formation.
- The setup allows for fluid transitions between defense and attack, with the midfielders playing key roles in both phases.
-
Weaknesses: Can leave midfield overwhelmed if outnumbered
- The defensive midfielder has a heavy workload, often covering large areas of the field, which can stretch the team.
- If the midfielders are caught out of position, the team might struggle with defensive cover, leaving the central defenders exposed.
- With only one defensive midfielder, there’s a risk of a lack of defensive depth, especially when facing a high-pressure attack.
-
Best for: Teams looking to hit on the break and capitalize on quick transitions
2-1-3 Formation: A flexible setup with a solid defense, creative midfield, and attacking wings to break through defenses
Source: 5-a-side